Trump's Third-Country Deportations Raise Humanitarian Concerns
The Trump administration's controversial third-country deportation policy faces backlash over perceived cruelty and legal challenges. Critics argue deportations to nations like South Sudan and Eswatini are unnecessarily harsh and aim to instill fear among immigrants. The policy's legality is under federal court review, fueling ongoing debates.

In a contentious move, the Trump administration is under fire for ramping up deportations to third countries like South Sudan and Eswatini, targeting immigrants convicted of serious crimes.
The policy, which critics label as cruel, reportedly sends individuals to unrelated nations. This includes sending people to countries like Libya initially, yet later returning them to their native lands.
Amidst legal scrutiny, allegations surface that the administration employs fear tactics to drive voluntary returns, stirring a heated debate over the policy's humanitarian implications and legality.
(With inputs from agencies.)
Advertisement
ALSO READ
Reviving Rural Healthcare: Challenges and Reforms for South Sudan’s Health Workforce
Govt to Restore Parliament’s Customary Marine Title Test Amid Legal Challenges
SA Raises Alarm Over Arrival of Dangerous Deportees in Neighboring Eswatini
The Silent Struggle: Mental Health Crisis in South Sudan
Activist Investors, Legal Challenges, and Market Surges Shape Global Health Landscape