Judicial Morality: Beyond Popular Opinion

Former Supreme Court judge Abhay S Oka emphasized the need for judges to separate personal beliefs from legal duties. He advocated for decisions based on legal and constitutional grounds rather than societal pressures or traditional morality, highlighting the critical role of trial courts.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 06-08-2025 21:04 IST | Created: 06-08-2025 21:04 IST
Judicial Morality: Beyond Popular Opinion
Justice
  • Country:
  • India

In an event organized by The Global Jurists, former Supreme Court judge Abhay S Oka underscored the importance of judges setting aside personal morality, religious, and political beliefs to uphold legal and constitutional principles. Judges, according to Oka, must execute their duties insulated from public opinion.

Justice Oka elaborated on how the judiciary should focus strictly on legal correctness, even facing public displeasure, while deciding cases. He cited examples where political figures have influenced public perception strongly, emphasizing that final judicial decisions should rest on evidence and laws, not political or societal pressures.

Additionally, Justice Oka criticized the terminology labeling trial courts as 'lower' or 'subordinate,' asserting that these courts are crucial venues where ordinary citizens can seek justice. His address highlighted the critical role played by trial and district courts in the Indian judicial framework.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback