Court Rules Voluntary Departure Disproves Kidnapping Allegation

The Allahabad High Court ruled that if a minor leaves their guardian voluntarily, a kidnapping case doesn't hold. The court quashed a case against Himanshu Dubey, as the minor involved didn't accuse him of abduction. The decision hinged on the minor voluntarily leaving due to familial abuse.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Prayagraj | Updated: 16-09-2025 21:29 IST | Created: 16-09-2025 21:29 IST
Court Rules Voluntary Departure Disproves Kidnapping Allegation
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court observed that instances where a minor voluntarily leaves their guardian's custody do not constitute kidnapping. This clarification could affect numerous ongoing legal cases involving alleged abductions.

Presiding over the case, Justice Vikram D Chauhan quashed the allegations against Himanshu Dubey, emphasizing that mere conversations with a minor do not equate to enticing them away from lawful guardianship. The ruling came after a minor, reportedly overburdened by familial circumstances, left home without implicating Dubey.

The court considered the minor's statement, revealing she departed due to family-inflicted distress, including physical abuse, contradicting claims of elopement. This judgment underscores the importance of assessing the minor's perspective and volition in such legal proceedings.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback