Landmark $1.5 Billion Settlement Paves New Path for AI Accountability
A California judge has given preliminary approval to a $1.5 billion settlement in a copyright class action filed by authors against AI firm Anthropic. This is the first such settlement involving tech companies using copyrighted material in AI training. Final approval awaits after notifying affected authors.

A California federal judge granted preliminary approval to a groundbreaking $1.5 billion settlement in a copyright class action involving Anthropic, an artificial intelligence company. This marks the first settlement in a series of lawsuits targeting tech giants like OpenAI, Microsoft, and Meta Platforms for utilizing copyrighted materials in AI training without consent.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup declared the proposed settlement fair after previously delaying his approval. He has asked for additional questions to be addressed before giving his final nod, which will follow the notification of affected authors, allowing them to file claims. Plaintiffs Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson hailed the decision as a step towards holding AI firms accountable.
Maria Pallante from the Association of American Publishers praised the settlement as a significant move towards curbing reckless infringement by AI developers. Meanwhile, Anthropic's deputy general counsel, Aparna Sridhar, expressed hopes to focus on developing beneficial AI systems. A trial is slated for December to assess further damages stemming from Anthropic's alleged misuse of over 7 million pirated books.
(With inputs from agencies.)
- READ MORE ON:
- AI
- copyright
- Anthropic
- settlement
- lawsuit
- tech companies
- OpenAI
- Microsoft
- Meta Platforms
- authors
ALSO READ
Appeal in Tylenol-Autism Lawsuit: Trump's Stance Fuels New Court Plea
Hershey Triumphs in Reese's Halloween Candy Lawsuit
Google Appeals to Supreme Court Over Unprecedented Epic Games Lawsuit Verdict
Fatal Collision Lawsuit: Airlines, Army, and FAA Under Scrutiny
Tylenol Autism Lawsuit: Trump's Medical Advisory Sparks Debate