Supreme Court Redirects Gurugram Demolition Plea to High Court
The Supreme Court refused to hear a plea challenging the demolition drive in Gurugram, advising petitioners to approach the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Petitioners argue authorities misconstrue a high court order, demolishing without notice. The high court's interim order stays a policy allowing 'stilt-plus-four floors' construction due to safety concerns.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court on Monday declined a plea challenging the continuing demolition operations in Gurugram, directing petitioners to the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi's bench disposed of the plea, allowing a swift high court mention.
Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan claimed that local authorities engaged in demolitions without prior notices, misinterpreting an interim high court order. The bench advised approaching the high court if the order was misconstrued. The petitioners requested a temporary hold on the demolition drive.
The bench noted that if the high court sought to address unauthorised constructions, interference was unwarranted. The high court had earlier halted new policies allowing additional floor construction in urban areas due to public safety concerns.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Vagdevi idol more important than Kohinoor: Bhojshala petitioners; seek its return from London
Boy falls to death from 15th floor of under-construction building in Greater Noida
Delhi govt to distribute summer kits having sattu, ORS, gamcha to 1 lakh construction workers
Goddess Vagdevi idol more important than Kohinoor, say petitioners; seek its return from London
NZ Reviews Dairy Industry Restructuring Act and Fonterra Competition Rules

