Judicial Elections in Mexico: Controversy and Concerns
Mexico is set to hold its first judicial elections in Durango, featuring candidates with controversial backgrounds. Critics worry about the risks of compromising the country's judiciary, especially with the involvement of individuals with criminal histories. President Claudia Sheinbaum supports the reform, aimed at rooting out corruption and democraticizing judge selection.

In a landmark judicial election in Mexico's Durango state, scrutiny intensifies as individuals with alleged criminal backgrounds vie for federal judge positions. Leopoldo Chavez, previously convicted of drug offenses in the U.S., is one of many candidates placing their credentials on the line.
The election, influenced by a reform championed by President Claudia Sheinbaum, aims to empower citizens in judge selection, raising criticism over potential threats to the judicial system's integrity. Critics, including rights organizations and Mexican lawmakers, warn this could pave the way for increased cartel influence.
As around 5,000 candidates contest over 840 positions, beyond doubts about individuals' eligibility persists. The reform's expedited implementation, lack of comprehensive vetting, and the complexity of ballots render this election a seminal test for Mexico's democracy.
(With inputs from agencies.)