Supreme Court's Birthright Citizenship Ruling Sparks Legal Showdown
The U.S. Supreme Court decision limited judges' use of national injunctions, impacting President Trump's birthright citizenship order. While the ruling supports Trump's policies, it faces constitutional challenges, leaving enforceability uncertain. Class action lawsuits and state challenges suggest potential nationwide implications for citizenship rights.

The U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling has reshaped judicial practices by curbing federal judges' use of nationwide injunctions, posing implications for the Trump administration's ambitious policy shifts, notably, the controversial birthright citizenship executive order.
This decision marks a victory for President Trump, easing judicial barriers to his policies, albeit leaving room for legal challenges against the order's constitutionality. The court's ruling allows time for these challenges, delaying the order's implementation.
Despite legal uncertainty, plaintiff groups, including states and advocacy organizations, are pursuing class-action statuses to counter the order. The outcome could define the extent of federal executive power and the enduring interpretation of citizenship under the 14th Amendment.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Court Upholds $5 Million Verdict Against Trump Amid Legal Challenges
Supreme Court Verdict Shifts Power Dynamics: A Win for Trump's Birthright Citizenship Stance
Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunctions, Birthright Citizenship Policy Uncertain
Supreme Clash: Trump Challenges Birthright Citizenship
Supreme Court Delivers 'Giant Win' on Birthright Citizenship