Court Blocks Trump Administration's Research Funding Cuts
A federal judge halted President Trump's administration from drastically reducing National Science Foundation research funding. The policy change, deemed arbitrary, risked invaluable technological work in AI and semiconductors by capping 'indirect' costs for universities, prompting significant financial concerns.

- Country:
- United States
In a significant legal decision, a federal judge has thwarted the Trump administration's plans to slash research funding provided by the National Science Foundation.
US District Judge Indira Talwani, residing in Boston, ruled against the proposed policy on Friday. The decision protects universities from losing tens of millions in critical research funding, arguing the policy endangered pivotal technological advancements in areas like artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and semiconductors.
The contested policy, presented in May by the NSF, sought to redefine 'indirect' costs, previously covered individually for grant recipients, capping them at 15% of the direct research costs. The University of California projected potential losses of nearly $100 million annually due to this cap.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
NIAT is Empowering Universities to Deliver NEP-Aligned, Industry-Ready Education
Global Health Developments: New Drug Threats and Policy Changes
Germany Invites Indian Students: Explore Top-Quality, Low-Cost Education in State-Run Universities
Strategic spending, not budget size, drives graduation outcomes in universities
Universities struggle to police AI use as academic integrity crisis deepens