Regulatory Retreat: Trump's Softer Banking Supervision
Under the Trump administration, U.S. bank regulators are adopting a more lenient approach, including pulling back on bank examinations and using fewer formal disciplinary notices. This shift is intended to focus on lenders' financial stability but has drawn criticism for neglecting broader risks. Regulatory reforms are ongoing amid staff reductions.

U.S. bank regulators are scaling back the intensity of some examinations and reducing reliance on formal disciplinary notices, signaling a regulatory shift under President Donald Trump. Executives in the industry confirm that regulatory bodies, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve, are easing measures on non-core banking issues, such as reputational risk and diversity.
The softer regulatory stance includes limiting examination scopes and opting for informal guidance over official notices. This is part of a broader strategy to focus on key financial metrics of safety and soundness. While officials aim for a risk-based approach, personnel cutbacks due to a hiring freeze have also contributed to the scaling back.
Critics, including Democrats and regulatory experts, advocate for a comprehensive supervision strategy, pointing to recent banking failures as evidence of insufficient oversight. Despite Trump's push for reform, transparent details on the changes remain sparse as regulators adjust their approaches, emphasizing financial risks over broader social and governance matters.
ALSO READ
Kim Jong Un's Diplomatic Train Journey: A High-Stakes Occasion
The Impact of Presidential Influence on U.S. Federal Reserve
Showdown Over Federal Reserve Independence: Trump's Legal Battle with Lisa Cook
Mortgage Controversy: The Case of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook
Morgan Stanley Challenges Federal Reserve's Capital Requirements