Controversy Erupts Over Language Exclusion in Lakshadweep Schools

Communist Party MP John Brittas criticized the exclusion of Mahal and Arabic from Lakshadweep schools under the NEP 2020, calling it unjust. The Kerala High Court has stayed the order. Brittas argues these languages are vital to the archipelago's cultural identity and demands a reconsideration of their exclusion.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 19-06-2025 19:00 IST | Created: 19-06-2025 19:00 IST
Controversy Erupts Over Language Exclusion in Lakshadweep Schools
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

In a significant pushback against the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, Communist Party of India (Marxist) MP John Brittas has voiced strong opposition to the removal of Mahal and Arabic languages from the Lakshadweep school's curriculum. In a letter to Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, Brittas articulated concerns over the socio-cultural and educational ramifications of this decision.

The NEP 2020 implementation plan proposes a three-language formula, but Brittas contends that applying this nationwide without due consideration to local contexts, especially in a linguistically rich region like Lakshadweep, risks undermining cultural heritage. He argues that each of the languages removed is a pillar of identity and crucial for the future aspirations of the island's communities.

While Malayalam and English are set to remain as primary languages of instruction, the sudden shift to include Hindi in place of Mahal and Arabic has spurred widespread criticism. The Kerala High Court recently issued a stay on the order, offering a temporary reprieve. Brittas calls for a democratic approach in revisiting the policy and emphasizes inclusion and consultation with stakeholders.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback