Novo Nordisk Drops U.S. Gender Targets Amid Trump DEI Crackdown
Novo Nordisk has abandoned gender representation targets in its U.S. operations, citing legal pressures from President Trump’s executive orders targeting corporate DEI initiatives. The move aligns Novo with other European pharmaceutical companies adjusting to the shifting U.S. regulatory landscape, raising broader questions about the future of corporate diversity commitments.

Novo Nordisk, the Danish pharmaceutical giant best known for its blockbuster obesity drug Wegovy, has announced it will no longer enforce gender representation requirements for senior leadership positions in its U.S. operations. The shift comes in response to new executive orders issued by President Donald Trump aimed at halting corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
In its first-quarter earnings statement, Novo Nordisk explained that while the company globally still aspires to achieve a minimum of 45% representation for each gender by the end of 2025, its American operations would no longer participate in this global initiative due to “evolving legal requirements.” The company’s decision marks a stark reversal. Until this week, Novo Nordisk had repeatedly affirmed its commitment to DEI principles, even when asked if it might adjust its stance under the new U.S. administration.
But Novo is not alone in recalibrating. Other European drugmakers are taking similar steps to shield themselves from potential penalties linked to Trump’s executive orders. In March, Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche abandoned its global diverse workforce targets, while compatriot Novartis announced it would end the use of diverse panels for U.S. hiring. Back in February, British pharmaceutical leader GSK declared it would no longer set diversity benchmarks for its American operations.
These corporate pivots reflect a broader trend: multinational companies, particularly in the pharmaceutical sector, are grappling with the challenge of reconciling their global social responsibility goals with the legal and political environment of the U.S. market. The Trump administration’s crackdown on DEI programs has created significant uncertainty, pushing companies to make difficult decisions about how to balance their commitments to equity with the risk of regulatory or legal consequences.
For Novo Nordisk, the decision underscores the delicate balancing act many multinational firms face. On one hand, the company continues to project an image of progressive values, emphasizing its global commitment to gender equity by 2025. On the other hand, the realities of operating in the U.S. — the world’s largest pharmaceutical market — are forcing a pragmatic, if uncomfortable, retreat from those values within American borders.
The stakes are high. For years, the pharmaceutical industry has been recognized for making strong strides in workforce diversity, often surpassing other corporate sectors in setting and achieving DEI goals. Yet the Trump administration’s efforts to curtail these initiatives have placed companies in a precarious position, threatening both their reputations and their compliance standings. As legal challenges mount, companies like Novo Nordisk are hedging their bets, making localized adjustments while trying to preserve their international commitments.
The road ahead remains uncertain. Will Novo Nordisk’s move signal the beginning of a larger corporate retreat from social responsibility commitments in the United States? Or will companies find new ways to navigate the tightening legal landscape while still championing diversity and inclusion? What’s clear is that the clash between global ideals and local politics is intensifying — and for the pharmaceutical giants caught in the middle, every move is under close watch.