Harm Reduction Strategies Ignored: Economic Impact of Tobacco Control Policies

A press briefing by the Consumer Choice Center explored the economic and public health implications of tobacco control policies in the Philippines. Experts discussed the financial burden of tobacco-related illnesses and advocated for harm reduction strategies. This approach could save billions, improve health outcomes, and align policies with consumer experiences.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 06-10-2025 11:18 IST | Created: 06-10-2025 11:18 IST
Harm Reduction Strategies Ignored: Economic Impact of Tobacco Control Policies
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The Consumer Choice Center recently organized a press briefing in the Philippines, focusing on missed opportunities in tobacco harm reduction under the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Experts from seven countries convened to discuss the potential of harm reduction approaches in tobacco policy.

Christopher Cabuay of De la Salle University highlighted the financial toll tobacco-related illnesses take on the Philippines, costing roughly $9.8 billion annually. He argues that shifting even a portion of smokers to harm reduction methods could result in substantial economic savings.

Anton Israel from the Nicotine Consumers Union criticized the disconnect between policy formation and consumers' actual experiences. Meanwhile, international voices emphasized the economic inefficiencies of restrictive regulations, with Nancy Loucas pointing out how bans lead to illicit markets, and Michael Landl advocating for risk-based taxation strategies.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback