Turbulence in Tibet: China's Geopolitical Water Power Play

China's Motuo Hydropower Station threatens regional stability, leveraging control over the vital Yarlung Zangbo River. The $170 billion project endangers India and Bangladesh, transforming water into a strategic tool. Critics argue it's less about renewable energy, serving instead as a bid for geopolitical dominance within South Asia.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 02-08-2025 18:54 IST | Created: 02-08-2025 18:54 IST
Turbulence in Tibet: China's Geopolitical Water Power Play
Tibet's Yarlung Zangbo Dam: China's new tool for environmental destruction, Brahmaputra domination (Photo/Reuters). Image Credit: ANI
  • Country:
  • China

China has embarked on an ambitious project to build what it claims will be the world's largest hydropower installation, the Motuo Hydropower Station, situated in the politically sensitive region of Tibet. The $170 billion venture is projected to generate an astounding 300 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity annually, equivalent to the entire annual consumption of the United Kingdom. However, its construction has sparked significant alarm across South Asia.

Experts and reports, including those from the Institute for Energy Research (IER) and the Lowy Institute, paint a troubling picture. Located on the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River – known as the Brahmaputra once it crosses into India and Bangladesh – the hydropower project provides China with potential control over a crucial transboundary water source. This situation gives Beijing a commanding position, potentially turning water into a geopolitical weapon.

In reaction, both India and Bangladesh have raised concerns, with India contemplating constructing a buffer dam on the Siang River to mitigate sudden water discharges from China. Beyond electricity, the project aligns with China's broader goals of industrialising Tibet and transferring power eastward. Nonetheless, critics argue this disguises the exploitation of the region. Furthermore, seasonal variability due to glacial melt could compromise energy reliability, yet China seems unfazed, using the project as a strategic asset rather than an ecological solution.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback