Supreme Court Upholds Accused Rights: Fair Trial and Document Access
The Supreme Court ruled that an accused person is entitled to receive documents and statements collected during investigations by the Enforcement Directorate. This follows a case involving Sarla Gupta, who challenged a previous High Court decision regarding document provision at the pre-trial stage.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court, in a landmark decision, affirmed the constitutional right to a fair trial by granting accused individuals access to documents and statements collected by the Enforcement Directorate during investigations.
This ruling mandates that upon taking cognizance of a prosecution complaint, the special judge must ensure that the accused is provided with a copy of the complaint, and any associated statements, documents, and exhibits, even if not used by investigators.
The verdict arose from a petition by Sarla Gupta, who contested a previous Delhi High Court decision claiming no obligation to furnish such documents at the pre-trial phase in a money laundering case. This decision reinforces the legal safeguards every accused is entitled to in judicial proceedings.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Enforcement Directorate Detains Gujarat Samachar Owner Amidst Controversy
Corruption Allegations Rock Enforcement Directorate
SC stays money laundering probe against Tamil Nadu-run liquor retailer TASMAC, says Enforcement Directorate crossing all limits
Bribery Scandal Rocks Enforcement Directorate in Kerala
Row over liquor shop licences: Enforcement Directorate is violating federal principle, how can it raid TASMAC, asks SC.