Supreme Court Criticizes MP for Remarks, Upholds Judicial Authority

The Supreme Court has criticized BJP MP Nishikant Dubey for his comments against the judiciary, asserting the Constitution's primacy over parliamentary and judicial authority. Dubey's remarks, deemed irresponsible by the court, suggested judiciary-induced anarchy. The Court stressed the necessity of judicial review, free speech, and handling of hate speech.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 08-05-2025 20:34 IST | Created: 08-05-2025 20:34 IST
Supreme Court Criticizes MP for Remarks, Upholds Judicial Authority
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The Supreme Court has strongly criticized BJP MP Nishikant Dubey for his recent comments against the judiciary and the Chief Justice of India, labeling them as scandalous and detrimental to the court's authority. These remarks rose amidst debate over the supremacy of Parliament or the judiciary, with the Court affirming the Constitution's ultimate authority.

In dismissing a public interest litigation against Dubey, the court emphasized its constitutional role in judicial review and highlighted that critical analysis and constructive critique of judicial decisions are protected under free speech. The court clarified its decisions should not be misconstrued as attempts to provoke civil unrest.

Addressing concerns about communal hatred and hate speech, the court stressed the importance of handling such issues with severity. It underscored the need for maintaining dignity and harmony in a multicultural society, expressing firm intent to intervene when bias and scandalous critiques arise.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback