Supreme Court Criticizes MP for Remarks, Upholds Judicial Authority
The Supreme Court has criticized BJP MP Nishikant Dubey for his comments against the judiciary, asserting the Constitution's primacy over parliamentary and judicial authority. Dubey's remarks, deemed irresponsible by the court, suggested judiciary-induced anarchy. The Court stressed the necessity of judicial review, free speech, and handling of hate speech.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court has strongly criticized BJP MP Nishikant Dubey for his recent comments against the judiciary and the Chief Justice of India, labeling them as scandalous and detrimental to the court's authority. These remarks rose amidst debate over the supremacy of Parliament or the judiciary, with the Court affirming the Constitution's ultimate authority.
In dismissing a public interest litigation against Dubey, the court emphasized its constitutional role in judicial review and highlighted that critical analysis and constructive critique of judicial decisions are protected under free speech. The court clarified its decisions should not be misconstrued as attempts to provoke civil unrest.
Addressing concerns about communal hatred and hate speech, the court stressed the importance of handling such issues with severity. It underscored the need for maintaining dignity and harmony in a multicultural society, expressing firm intent to intervene when bias and scandalous critiques arise.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Robust Judiciary: Chief Justice Roberts Rebukes Impeachment Threats
Nishikant Dubey remarks: SC says any attempt to spread communal hatred, hate speech must be dealt with iron hand.
Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna Plans Law-Focused Post-Retirement Career
Justice Gavai Takes Oath as 52nd Chief Justice of India
Justice Gavai's Journey: From Amravati to Chief Justice of India