Supreme Court Verdict: NSEL Scam Assets Under MPID Act
The Supreme Court upheld that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code moratorium does not prevent asset attachment under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act. The judgement clarifies that secured creditors cannot claim priority over properties linked to the NSEL fraud case, which are attached under specific acts to protect depositors.

- Country:
- India
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court decided that the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) does not block asset attachments under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (MPID) Act. Justices Bela M Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma upheld the orders concerning the National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) fraud.
The judgement addressed two critical questions related to secured creditors' priority over assets attached under the PMLA and MPID Act. The bench clarified that creditors cannot claim priority due to the SARFAESI and RDB Acts. The ruling emphasizes that properties linked to the NSEL fraud were acquired with depositor funds, reaffirming protection for defrauded investors in Maharashtra.
The case highlights legislative competence and supports the MPID Act's validity, asserting state powers to protect depositors. With substantial claims under the MPID Act, the court ruled that attached assets remain beyond the debtor-creditor realm as envisaged by the IBC, reinforcing the act's public interest purpose.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Himachal Fraud Case: Social Worker or Scammer?
High Court Upholds Nirav Modi Bail Rejection Amidst PNB Fraud Case
London High Court Rejects Nirav Modi's 10th Bail Plea in PNB Fraud Case
Boeing Nears Settlement in 737 MAX Fraud Case
Indian national pleads guilty in U.S immigration fraud case involving fake robberies