Judge Rules Against U.S. Deportation Plan Amid Legal Controversy

A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. government violated a court order by attempting to deport migrants to South Sudan, highlighting tensions between Donald Trump and the judiciary over immigration policies. The ruling underscores ongoing legal battles against the administration's efforts to expedite deportations.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 22-05-2025 01:51 IST | Created: 22-05-2025 01:51 IST
Judge Rules Against U.S. Deportation Plan Amid Legal Controversy
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

A federal judge has reprimanded the U.S. government for attempting to deport migrants to South Sudan in breach of his court order. The controversy delineates the ongoing discord between former President Donald Trump and the judiciary concerning immigration enforcement strategies.

Judge Brian Murphy, appointed by President Joe Biden, warned U.S. officials they risk being held in contempt for moving to deport individuals without adequate notice or regard for their safety. The administration's approach has faced significant pushback from the courts, impeding Trump's hardline deportation policies.

Despite the Department of Homeland Security's claim that the deportees are dangerous criminals, Murphy emphasized the importance of due process and the potential hazards in South Sudan. The broader legal challenges hint at increasing scrutiny of the administration's immigration decisions.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback