EU Leaders Call for Human Rights Reinterpretation on Migration
Nine EU country leaders have proposed a reinterpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights to allow greater flexibility in deporting criminal migrants. Their open letter criticizes the European Court of Human Rights for restricting national government actions, affecting handling of irregular migration and expulsion decisions.

- Country:
- Italy
In a bid to address irregular migration more effectively, leaders from nine European Union countries are advocating for a reinterpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. They believe the current interpretations limit governmental flexibility in deporting migrants who have committed crimes. This stance was detailed in an open letter made public in Rome on Thursday.
The letter, signed by leaders from Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland, criticizes the European Court of Human Rights for its handling of cases concerning the expulsion of criminal foreign nationals. It argues that the court's decisions have been overly protective and have placed unnecessary constraints on national authorities.
Despite a 27% decrease in irregular border crossings into the EU this year, the leaders argue that the issue remains significant. They point out that although unauthorized migration figures have varied, they are not as high as during the 2015 refugee crisis, which saw over a million arrivals, primarily due to the Syrian civil war.
(With inputs from agencies.)