Lawyer Denied Anticipatory Bail in Document Forgery Case

A court denied anticipatory bail to a lawyer accused of aiding in forgery of trust documents. The lawyer, practicing for thirty years, allegedly notarized a forged document while the trust's chairman was hospitalized. His custodial interrogation was deemed necessary due to suspicious inconsistencies found during the investigation.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Mumbai | Updated: 11-08-2025 21:47 IST | Created: 11-08-2025 21:47 IST
Lawyer Denied Anticipatory Bail in Document Forgery Case
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

A court in the city has rejected the anticipatory bail application of a 60-year-old lawyer charged with facilitating the creation of forged trust documents. The court emphasized the expectation of 'care and integrity' from the lawyer, given his thirty-year career as a notary.

The order, delivered by additional sessions judge NG Shukla, noted that the trust's chairman, whose signature was allegedly forged, had been incapacitated in a hospital. Despite this, documents suggest he signed the notary register, which the court found unlikely.

The lawyer, Ramji Gupta, is being prosecuted for cheating, forgery, and criminal breach of trust by Mumbai's Economic Offences Wing. Inconsistencies, such as overwriting in the notary register, led the court to determine that Gupta's custodial interrogation is essential.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback