Constitutional Clash: Centre Challenges Imposed Timelines for State Bills

The Centre has expressed concerns against imposing fixed timelines for governors and the president to act upon bills passed by state assemblies, suggesting this could upset the constitutional balance of powers. The Centre's written submissions to the Supreme Court argue that such a move could lead to 'constitutional disorder.'

According to Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's note, the Constitution does not foresee one organ of government taking on powers not meant for it, suggesting judicial intervention should not replace the constitutionally-sanctioned mechanisms like electoral accountability and legislative oversight.

The Supreme Court is set to hear submissions from various states and the Centre. President Droupadi Murmu's reference under Article 143(1) follows an apex court verdict setting a three-month decision timeline on bills by the president, amplifying the ongoing debate over constitutional delineations of power.

(With inputs from agencies.)