Belgium's Defence Dilemma: Balancing Security with Sustainability

Belgium's Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot expressed skepticism about increasing defence spending to 3.5% of GDP, as proposed by NATO's Secretary General. Belgium plans to meet the current NATO target of 2% but views the proposed increase as unsustainable, potentially affecting social cohesion.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Warsaw | Updated: 08-05-2025 22:02 IST | Created: 08-05-2025 22:02 IST
Belgium's Defence Dilemma: Balancing Security with Sustainability
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • Poland

Belgium's Foreign Minister, Maxime Prevot, has voiced reservations about NATO's proposed increase in defence spending. Speaking to Reuters on Thursday, Prevot remarked that raising Belgium's defence budget to 3.5% of GDP, as suggested by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, lacks feasibility. The proposal closely aligns with President Donald Trump's demand for a 5% spending target, including broader security-related investment.

Prevot highlighted the challenges Belgium faces in simply reaching the current 2% target. The nation, which allocated only 1.29% of its GDP to defence in 2024, remains committed to achieving the 2% benchmark. However, further hikes to 3.5% by 2029 could impose unreasonable economic strain, he argued.

Citing a need for sustainability and maintained social cohesion, Prevot emphasized the importance of balanced economic management over forcing rapid increases in defence funding. This nuanced stance reflects the broader tension among NATO members in fulfilling heightened defence expectations.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback