AI and Asylum: The Perils of Automated Decision-Making in Migration

The UK plans to use AI to expedite the asylum claim process amid surging global migration. Rights groups warn automation could endanger lives, citing biases and inaccuracies. A pilot study shows less than half of users received correct information. Governments are increasingly adopting digital tools to manage migration challenges.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 09-05-2025 18:03 IST | Created: 09-05-2025 18:03 IST
AI and Asylum: The Perils of Automated Decision-Making in Migration
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

The United Kingdom is set to tackle its staggering asylum backlog by deploying artificial intelligence (AI) in the decision-making process. As migration numbers hit unprecedented levels, the move aims to streamline parts of the clogged system, yet has attracted criticism from rights groups.

AI tools will provide caseworkers with summaries and country-specific advice to expedite decisions, but critics argue this could dehumanize the process and put lives at risk. A pilot study revealed issues with AI's accuracy, sparking concerns about potential biases and the system's reliability in life-or-death situations.

Migrant charities emphasize the necessity of investing in human decision-makers. The government, however, insists that a human will remain involved in final decisions. As migration becomes a pressing voter issue, the UK is exploring digital solutions amidst global displacement trends.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback