Legal Justifications Questioned in Trump's Conflict with Iran

The U.S. State Department has defended President Donald Trump's military actions against Iran, claiming they were conducted in self-defense and in support of Israel, rather than initiating a new war. This statement by Legal Adviser Reed Rubinstein comes as the Trump administration faces a May 1 deadline to secure congressional approval under the 1973 War Powers Act.

The conflict began with U.S. and Israeli airstrikes on February 28, targeting Iran's leadership and military infrastructure after unsuccessful talks between the U.S. and Iran. However, many legal experts argue these actions contravene the United Nations Charter, as Iran did not present an immediate threat.

The war's impact has led to economic disruptions, including fuel price hikes, which are affecting public opinion in the U.S., with a majority blaming President Trump for the increase. As the May deadline approaches, Congress remains divided, with Democrats pushing for an end to the conflict, while most Republicans continue to block such efforts.

(With inputs from agencies.)