Nordic Nations' Forest Dilemma: Economic Impact of Climate Targets
Sweden and Finland face potential economic hardships due to EU-imposed climate targets related to forest use. These targets aim to boost CO2 absorption by forests but are considered unrealistic by both nations due to external factors. Reducing logging could severely impact their economies and labor markets.
- Country:
- Sweden
This week, Sweden and Finland warned of severe economic repercussions if compelled to scale back on forestry activities to comply with EU climate mandates. These measures are part of the EU's strategy to attain net zero emissions by 2050, placing pressure on these nations to enhance CO2 sequestration via forests.
However, Sweden and Finland concede they might fall short of the EU's Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) targets for forthcoming periods, attributing the shortfall to climate change-induced slow tree growth and heightened demand due to the Ukraine conflict. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson criticized the EU's forest usage framework on X, warning of its detrimental effects.
While industries and environmentalists acknowledge forests' crucial role in climate mitigation, scientific voices highlight that current forestry practices might undermine these efforts. In a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the two countries claimed their targets are daunting, warning of serious economic and labor market impacts if logging is reduced, considering forests' critical role in their economies.
(With inputs from agencies.)
Google News