Supreme Court to Review Appeals Delay for Convicts
The Supreme Court agreed to review a plea by 10 convicts whose appeals were delayed by the Jharkhand High Court. The appeals, reserved for two to three years, affect convicts on death row and those serving life sentences. The overdue judgments have raised fundamental rights concerns.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to scrutinize the plea of 10 convicts, including six on death row, concerning the delayed appeal verdicts by the Jharkhand High Court. The appeals have been pending for two to three years despite being reserved for judgment.
A Supreme Court bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, issued a notice to the Jharkhand government, demanding an explanation regarding the delay. Advocate Fauzia Shakil, representing the convicts, argued the high court had reserved its verdict years ago, raising concerns over the convicts' rights.
The convicts, held in Birsa Munda Central Jail and one in Dumka Central Jail, argue their fundamental rights under Article 21 are at stake due to the protracted delay. The Supreme Court seeks to establish mandatory guidelines for timely pronouncement of judgments in high courts.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Transatlantic Defense Dynamics: Germany's Strategic Appeals in Washington
Hong Kong's Pro-Democracy Saga: Trials, Tribulations, and Appeals
Kashmir's Struggle for Dignity: A Call for Fundamental Rights
Jammu and Kashmir Students Association Appeals to Karnataka CM Over Hijab Dispute
Prisoners not getting costly food doesn't violate fundamental rights: SC