Acquittal in 2008 Malegaon Blast: A Tale of Contradictory Investigations

A special court's recent acquittal in the 2008 Malegaon blast has highlighted notable discrepancies between investigations by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) and the National Investigation Agency (NIA). The court found stark contrasts in the recounting of events, particularly regarding the location and method used to plant explosives.

Judge A K Lahoti underscored the deficiencies in both agencies' charge sheets, emphasizing the need for substantial evidence rather than allegations. The ruling cleared seven accused individuals, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, asserting the prosecution failed to present a complete chain of conclusive evidence.

The judgement criticized the premature sanction granted to invoke the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, describing it as lacking a judicious application of mind. This verdict serves as a reminder that the justice system requires credible evidence, irrespective of prevailing public perceptions and sentiments.

(With inputs from agencies.)