Congress vs Tharoor: The Surgical Strike Debate

Tensions within the Congress party increased as Shashi Tharoor's comments regarding surgical strikes initiated debate. Tharoor, mistakenly claimed that such strikes were first conducted in 2016, sparking criticism from colleagues. The Congress clarified these actions occurred during the UPA era. Despite the backlash, Tharoor defended his stance from Panama City.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 29-05-2025 19:00 IST | Created: 29-05-2025 19:00 IST
Congress vs Tharoor: The Surgical Strike Debate
Tensions
  • Country:
  • India

Tensions between Congress and its leader, Shashi Tharoor, escalated over his erroneous remark on surgical strikes against Pakistan being first conducted in 2016. While the party maintained Tharoor remained part of the Congress family, they corrected his claim with historical Congress-led UPA actions against terror threats.

Tharoor, amidst a multi-country diplomatic tour, addressed the criticism stating his comments focused on reprisals for recent terrorist attacks. He emphasized his remarks were not about past wars and criticized those distorting his views for political gain. He reiterated this stance with a post from Panama City.

Congress leaders like Randeep Surjewala attempted to diffuse tensions by reinstating party unity, despite the backlash from figures such as Pawan Khera, who highlighted contradictions in Tharoor's statements and called for a focus on historical accuracies rather than political bickering.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback