Supreme Court Backs Election Panel's Rigorous Voter Roll Review

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has upheld the Election Commission's authority to perform a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists, reinstating its role in ensuring the constitutionality of fair elections. The court determined that removing names from voter rolls is not equivalent to questioning an individual's citizenship.

Headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant, the bench stated that SIR underscores the constitutional need for free and fair elections. It validated the Election Commission's powers under Article 324 and the Representation of the People Act for conducting SIR, which aims to correct inaccuracies in voter lists through a comprehensive review process.

The ruling came amidst political controversy, with some criticizing it as an unfair process impacting legitimate voters. Despite the discontent, the court found the SIR necessary for maintaining electoral roll integrity amid urban shifts and migrations, thus fulfilling the democratic mandate. It clarified that any disputed citizenship issues must be formally adjudicated.

The case arose from petitions challenging the SIR's initiation in Bihar, where 65 lakh names were removed from electoral rolls due to urbanization and migration. The verdict confirms that the Election Commission can indeed verify voter eligibility to safeguard the electoral procedure, supporting the democratic framework.

(With inputs from agencies.)